Why RIM Won’t Do ‘An Apple’

There’s been lots of RIM news this week with the AGM on Tuesday and the media post-mortem in the days that followed.  One interesting piece I’ve read in recent days was written by a friend of mine, Linda Ockenwell-Jenner, for the Telus Talks Business blog, looking at why it’s not all over for RIM and how Apple demonstrates that anything can – and does – happen.  Her piece, ‘Reaching Out For Global Success‘, makes some interesting points. I hope she’s right in her analysis, but here’s why I don’t think that RIM will be able to pull off that incredible turnaround in fortunes that Apple has in recent years:

  • The first is leadership.  Apple had Steve Jobs.  RIM has Thorsten Heins.  I’m not saying that Mr. Heins isn’t a competent leader – I have nothing concrete to base my assessment of him on – but he’s not Steve Jobs.  Competence is not going to be enough to save RIM.  Steve Jobs has been many things over the last decade – think of a superlative and it has probably been used to describe him – but one of the things that made him special was his vision. RIM needs a vision right now and, based on what I’ve seen and read, Mr. Heins doesn’t have it.
  • The next reason why I think RIM won’t do an Apple-style turnaround is market conditions.  A lot has changed since Apple launched the first iPhone.  The iPhone, as Apple’s advertising has made sure everybody knows, ‘changed everything’.  When the first iPhone launched, its competitors were handsets like the Samsung Ultra Smart F700 [remember that one?!], the Motorola Razr V3i [you’d forgotten about that one, hadn’t you?] and there were rumours that Microsoft was working on an iPhone killer – the Zune cell phone! Today there are hundreds of handsets that all offer the same, or similar, capabilities.  RIM’s BB10 will be a significant evolution, but it isn’t going to change anything in the marketplace.  Unless things at RIM improve quickly, it will find it increasingly difficult to retain or attract the talent required to turn things around.
  • A third reason that RIM won’t do ‘an Apple’ is cultural.  Apple had a culture that believed it could change the world… RIM doesn’t.  It also isn’t set up to compete effectively in the current cellphone market.  The company appears slow to respond, unable to get product to market quickly enough and unsure about who its target market is.  It also appears unable to identify its USP and market to them effectively.

I hope I’m wrong.  I REALLY hope I’m wrong… but I fear that I won’t be.  What do you think it’ll take for RIM to pull of a turnaround of Apple-esque proportions?

2 Replies to “Why RIM Won’t Do ‘An Apple’”

  1. There are over 70 million people that love BlackBerry and want them to succeed. There are hundreds of thousands of people that have twittered their regret of leaving Blackberry for some other device (aka Android).

    I like that RIM is waiting to release BB10 because they want to get it right. I like my BlackBerry – I get things done and don’t spend my dinners with friends playing games. I love my BlackBerry, because BBM is the best smartphone app there is.

  2. RIM doesn’t have a Jobs and other Apple-esque attributes yet it does have over 75 million customers who remain loyal. iPhone and there like are flashier yet they’re not secure – this is what’s going to save RIM. Privacy and security do matter particularly in the business world and in countries that aren’t so free – RIMs market for now. Canada, USA and others will follow suit.

Leave a Reply to Murray McCullough Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *